login join help ad

February 25, 2010

John Carmack on Obama's plan for NASA

An article in an unusual place says things with which I find it difficult to disagree, like so:

For years now, whenever a reporter asked me what I thought about returning to the moon with the country’s existing Constellation technology, I said something along the lines of “It’s like watching a slow motion train wreck. It isn’t going to end well.”

I have an excellent working relationship with the parts of NASA that my company deals with, but honestly, I thought the program was going to drag on for another half decade and piss away several more tens of billions of dollars before being re-scoped due to failure to deliver.

This is a rather important point. NASA fanboys (e.g. Mike Pinto) like to pretend that it was only a question of funding. But in fact NASA demonstrated its impotency, which was impossible to fix with money. A structural reform was needed.

Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at 04:31 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 158 words, total size 1 kb.

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
6kb generated in CPU 0.01, elapsed 0.0236 seconds.
22 queries taking 0.0159 seconds, 28 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.